Comments on: Uh, no.

By: Kelly

Kelly — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:35:05 +0000

@ bonobobabe

No, I didn’t. I can’t say I’m surprised, though I am disappointed. As with PETA’s nude print ads, Bitch’s willingness to associate themselves with a patriarchal pornographer is the most troubling aspect of the story (Hustler in Bitch’s case, Playboy for PETA).

By: bonobobabe

bonobobabe — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 14:44:06 +0000

Glad to hear you won’t be renewing your “Bust” subscription. It’s NOT a feminist magazine, despite what it calls itself. And I notice you have a “Bitch” magazine thingy in your sidebar.

Did you know they sponsor a burlesque show along with Hustler?

http://www.teaseorama.com/sponsors.html

http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?p=4121

By: Traci

Traci — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:44:59 +0000

ugh I missed this ad… seriously… is my vagina safe with no one??? -_-