So that makes the hymen a child-proof cap?
August 1st, 2008 4:07 pm by KellyJust when I start thinking that Larry King couldn’t possibly get any denser…well, just check it:
KING: OK. A strange story.
We begin here in Los Angeles with Davida Kelley, a former member of the Children of God. It’s now called Family International. She was raised in the household of that sect’s now dead leader, David Berg, whom she says sexually abused her.
Also here is Amy Bril, a former member of the Children of God. She was summoned to the household of David Berg as a young child and married to him at age 13. […]
KING: At what age were you first tampered with?
Yes, “tampered with”. Because the human body is like a Tylenol bottle, and sexual assault is similar to fiddling with the safety packaging on an unopened package of aspirin.
King returns to this clumsy euphemism for “rape” several times throughout the interview:
KING: And Ricky, Davida, he killed, what, the person who was his nanny?
KELLEY: Yes. She was one of many nannies who…
KING: Tampered with him.
KELLEY: Yes, when he was a child.
Remember, we’re talking about child rape and sexual exploitation. “Tampering” doesn’t even begin to describe the horror of what these children (now adults) endured. You “tamper” with a toilet and a roll of Saran Wrap on April Fool’s Day in order to pull a prank on your younger sibling. To refer to ritualized, lifelong sexual abuse and exploitation as “tampering” is to minimize, deny and obscure the realities of what actually took place.
FYI, though King does use the terms “sexual assault” and “sexual abuse” several times throughout the interview, the word “rape” does not appear once - not once! - in the entire, hour-long transcript. Go figure.
———————–
Tagged: larry king cnn rape sex sexual abuse sexual assault msm
























August 3rd, 2008 at 10:46 am
“Tampered with”? That’s an interesting pseudonym. It almost as though King was consciously re-assaulting the survivor with a term like that. His age shined through in that interview.
August 3rd, 2008 at 12:34 pm
Not to mention, every time they cut to him during the interview, he was making his trademark grimace. Usually I find it funny (constipated much?), but it was just flat-out disrespectful in this context.
Between him and Glenn Beck, I gotta wonder how hard up CNN is for programming.